I’m not convinced this policy shift is entirely beneficial. While it does encourage private sector experience, it might create an unfair advantage for those already established in private roles. Fresh graduates could find it tough to compete.
While the optimism around Romania's legislative changes is understandable, we must remain cautious about potential implementation challenges. The ambiguity surrounding new exemptions could lead to confusion, and continuous updates may create uncertainties for both employers and employees. It's...
I'm skeptical about the effectiveness of these new immigration rules. Are they really in sync with industry needs, or just another layer of bureaucracy?
Are we sure that increasing the minimum salary thresholds will actually encourage businesses to hire locally? Could this not just exacerbate the talent shortages we're already facing in certain sectors?
I'm a bit skeptical about the high financial commitment required for this program. It's a significant amount of money, and I wonder if the benefits truly outweigh the costs.
I’m skeptical about how many startups will actually want to deal with these requirements. Startups are already on thin ice when it comes to funding, and now they have to meet E-Verify and competitive wage standards? Sounds like a losing battle to me.
There’s a lot of talk about Prabowo’s potential policies, but I’m cautious. The balance between attracting foreign investors and developing the local workforce is delicate. Too much focus on one could alienate the other. It’s a scenario that needs careful handling to ensure sustainable growth.
Seems like a good move to extend the deadline, but does anyone else feel like this is just a temporary fix? What happens when these extended deadlines aren't enough due to ongoing bureaucratic delays?
While the optimism is appreciated, we must not overlook the need for robust mechanisms to assess and mitigate the risks involved. The effectiveness of these policies in practice should be questioned and scrutinized to ensure that the intended benefits are realized without unintended consequences.
Hmm, I don’t know if the government’s promises will actually hold up in the long term, especially with no new taxes. Feels like a setup for reduced public service funding if they’re not careful with this tax cut. Any evidence of how they’re planning to balance this?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.